A nifty new bike and a hand-me-down for little brother
Happy birthday, Little Guy. You’ve got your wheels, and you’re on your way.
. . . the story of my life
Web 2.0 is reality because humanity does not want to be alone, and ideas and thoughts are meant to be shared. There may be no new ideas under the sun, but when we share our ideas we find a new level of understanding and new paths of interaction. I believe that I am at my best productivity level when I spend myself sharing time and thoughts with others who are thinking and working on similar efforts. Sometimes those others don’t even have to be thinking about the same subjects, but pursuing parallel courses in the universe of knowledge.
I read 2 posts this evening about this subject:
Kathy Sierra in Creating Passionate Users talks about “knowledge sharers” and “knowledge hoarders.” She talks about the synthesizing of ideas derived on the work of others and the resulting creative leaps of innovation. There is a great chart comparing linear movement on “progress on the ‘shoulders of giants’” to distributed knowledge producing innovation through the “wisdom of crowds” and “progress in the ‘Mosh Pit’”
I then followed Kathy’s link to Bill Kinnon’s Achieving Ends. He talks about “The Generous Web” and a “sea of people generously sharing.” He references the term “A-list bloggers” and says that he has found them “open and accessible . . . which is partly why they are as successful as they are.” He quotes David Freeman’s difference between Arrogance and Pride – “Arrogance is ‘I’m valuable, you’re nothing.’ Pride, or dignity is ‘I’m valuable, you’re valuable.'”
When I entered the biblioblogosphere it was scary. I wrote and wrote, just as I have for most of my life, first of all in a pink mini-keyed diary and later in spiral-bound journals. I started blogging (very privately) after my return from Internet Librarian in 2003. But, I guarded my URL and even put the (perhaps ineffective) meta tag in the header: meta content=”NOINDEX,NOFOLLOW” name=”ROBOTS”.
I blogged for over 2 years before I made my big ta-da into the blogosophere. Well it wasn’t long before I was carrying on exciting electronic conversations with librarians and information professionals from the A, B, and C list of bloggers. I now regularly share ideas with people I previously idoled from afar on stages at conferences or in columns in professional journals. I’m honored when others ask me questions and I’m enlighted when they answer mine. As Kathy says “Issac Newton said, ‘If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants.’ That was just fine in a world where knowledge doubled in half-centuries, not mere months. To make progress today, it’s more like, ‘If I have seen further, it is by being thrown up by the mosh pit of my peers.’ And we all get a turn.”
During the NBA Finals game last night, I caught a plug for Blog Maverick, written by Dallas Maverick’s owner, Mark Cuban. For a peek into the backstage of the NBA, check it out!
A newspaper reported last week that the Homework Center is closing in a neighborhood where many at-risk kids live. The help center was a partnership between the housing authority and school district, who somehow managed to run this service, which was open 2 days a week, on $13,000 a year. The news story told about the end-of-year party that marked the end of this one-room place which has become a neighborhood center for children to come to for the past 13 years. One young man, an immigrant from Laos, started coming to the Center when he was 4 years old. He got help with his homework, became a tutor, and is now graduating from high school.
Another help center in the city closed 6 months ago. According to the article, the closings are due to lack of funding. A tutor at the center was quoted: “”It’s really sad, if you want to know the truth. It’s very sad. It’s become a community center for this housing area, actually.”
The story has haunted me for the past 5 days since I read it. What will become of the kids who got help with their homework there? Without the caring tutoring of the Homework Center, how many will ultimately fail and drop out of school – possibly ending up in trouble and incarcerated. The $13,000 a year pales in comparison to the cost of lost lives, not to mention the cost of incarceration. According to a Bureau of Justice report on State Prison Expenditures 2001, Minnesota spent $37,000 per year for each of the 6,514 inmates in state prisons in that year. And the number of persons in confinement has increased, as evidenced by recent reports of counties who are building new, larger jails. Jurisdictions who are unable to house all their prisoners are paying anywhere from $55 to $85 a day to other counties or states who so far have beds available in their jails or correctional facilities. Seems to me that funding the Homework Center is a bargain at twice this year’s cost.
I hope that our city will find a way to continue these neighborhood education centers – by providing adequate funds to organizations who are well positioned to work in neighborhoods. What a great place for an expanded community center partnership that might include a satellite library in these neighborhoods where at-risk kids and their families live. If we want to keep any child from being left behind we need after school programs, pre-K literacy, and homework help in the neighborhood where the kid lives.
Stumbled accidentally on a notable blog, Deb’s Lunch. . . and dinner and breakfast too, about one of my favorite subjects – cooking – from Deb Shapiro, faculty member of UW-Madison Graduate School of Library and Information Science. Beautiful pictures!
Incidentally, looking for a Bed ‘n Breakfast in the Black Hills – check out The Anchorage, owned by Lin (& Jim) Gogolin, another great librarian cook.
Looks like The Christian Science Monitor has once again raised the perennial question of library fines – or late fees. They even have a survey, asking the opinion of readers: “Should library fines be abolished?” As of this writing, out of 238 votes, 168 said “No. Fines help to keep borrowers in line and can be a needed source of income for small towns.” And 70 said “Yes. Late fees are more trouble than they’re worth, and they cast libraries in a negative light.”
While I realize that some libraries believe they receive considerable income from the fines collected (csmonitor.com cites the Chicago Public Library having brought in $1.1 million in revenue last year from fines, even without using a collection agency), the article proposes that the cost of good will may be higher, not to mention the undefined labor costs of cash collecting and management.
I previously worked for the Air Force Library Service, where we did not collect fines. Our ultimate threat was collecting for unreturned materials after a generous period of time. Recently, several of our library directors have shared that they are considering or experimenting with elimination of fines. Our Online Schools do not, indeed under state law cannot, charge overdue fees. From anecdotal evidence, it doesn’t appear that there is significant difference in number of lost materials between those libraries that assess fines and those that do not.
The real questions for libraries to ask are: Why is the fine in place? What is the cost of the whole process? What would be the cost of eliminating the fine process? What could be gained in good will if fines were eliminated? or even . . . . How much might library usage be increased if citizens didn’t fear past or future fines?
Anyway, as George says: “Vote early, vote often.” (hurry, poll closes 30 days from start of survey, according to csmonitor.com)
And in the meantime, can we at least call them late fees instead of fines?
Our local paper, the Post Bulletin has a weekly column called “Your Style” which features someone who has been nominated by someone else for their personal style. Tonight’s column features fine Mayo Medical Librarian, Kelly Arp. The reporter who wrote the piece was obviously hung up on a librarian stereotype which is as unrealistic as a male cigar-smoking reporter with a drink in hand. In the interview, 4 of the 7 questions asked try to measure Kelly’s style against what the reporter thinks she should look like. I suggest that the reporter get rid of her tired cliches and walk across the street to get acquainted with some real librarians. Her questions:
Q: Your nominator said that although you’re a librarian you don’t fit the stereotype. What do you wear that makes you stand out?
Q: What do you switch it up with?
Q: Is there anything in your wardrobe that would fit the classic librarian look?
Q: How would you categorize your style?
Q: Librarians are known for finding information fast. Does that translate to shopping as well?
Q: Where do you shop?
Q: Is your closet organized like the Dewey Decimal System?
While enjoying my morning coffee and paper I was thrilled to find librarians “Sainted” in the weekly Pioneer Press’s “Sainted and Tainted” column – of course the librarians were the sainted ones!
Sainted: The Ramsey County Library on Beam Avenue in Maplewood. Not for any one specific act but for their consistent willingness to help no matter what is asked of them, friendly service, vast knowledge and overall good service. As a regular patron, I think their good job performance should be recognized.
Knowing and working with as many library folks as I do, I wasn’t surprised. Our librarians across the 11 counties of southeastern Minnesota are just as willing to help and provide good service as those in Ramsey County. The words that jumped off the page at me were the ones where the nominator cited librarians’ “vast knowledge.”
I’ve thought about this aspect (having vast knowledge – aka being the resident smart person) of the librarian persona a lot lately after having started the week with Michael Stephens as he began his whirlwind Tame the Web Northern Tour. Following the Monday session, one of my rural librarians came to me and said, “Y’know, Barb this is all very interesting, but I don’t see that it has a lot of relevance for me in my farming community. They don’t use computers, and we don’t have a need for blogs and wikis, and podcasts.”
We talked for a while (I talked, she nodded) until she agreed to come to our next blogging class and consider writing a blog for her library web presence, as a number of our members have. However, I think there is an element of truth in what she said. And therein lies the value for her (or any librarian) to become Library 2.0 literate. Communities have lots of utilities: the fire people, the power people, the water people, the roads people, and the smart people — that’s where libraries fit in. Who else can assume the responsibility for being the resident knowledge expert? Indeed, who else is there to do it? The majority of the library’s community might not be ready today to participate in wikis, or hear podcasts, but they sure as heck are hearing about them in the media. And who else is there to explain to them what’s going on? The library, as the utility for lifelong learning, has the opportunity to inform their communities about Library/Web/World 2.0. And who knows, pretty soon (if not already) there will be a use for a blog, or a wiki, or maybe even a podcast.
KTTC TV carried a newstory tonight about Lyle, one of our schools. A quote from the the 10:00 news copied from the KTTC website: “Superintendent Jerry Reshetar is excited with the progress and he can’t wait to set up the media center which he says will be the central focus of the building and a great addition for the entire community.”
Note — he talked about the media center! Amazing! Additionally, this media center is run by Fran Zosulis, a great, fully certified media specialist. That is one lucky group of students who have a superintendent who cares about their media center. But then I’ve known it for a long time – ever since I met Mr. Reshetar. Congratulations, Lyle School and Community (population 500+). I can’t wait to see your new school and library media center in September.